Monday, July 1, 2013

What are your thoughts??

In chapter 6, Tovani emphasizes the importance of helping our students find the correct method(s) for them to put their thoughts onto a paper. She does speak about the traditional stick notes and highlighter methods, which at the beginning of their used don’t tend to be completely effective, but she does state that the more they are used and modeled by the teacher for their correct used, they often succeed for their purpose. For Tovani, the importance of students writing down their thoughts and or questions is a fundamental key to see the progress a student has gotten in their reading and writing skills, because “…asking questions is a signal that you are constructing meaning. Readers who don’t ask questions are often disengaged and unable to remember what they’ve read” (pg: 80).
But besides these useful methods, Tovani also integrates other methods that she believes are just as good as the good ol’ highlighter. The first method she talks about was that of “whole-group thinking” which is the placing of student’s individual work on a “public” chart. This posting Tovani says will begin the stepping stone process that students need to learn how to mark important text in their reading for future reference; “when some students are having difficulty seeing a strategy in use, I chart other students’ thinking” (pg: 75). I do believe this is a useful tool for students understanding of the options they have to mark down their reading thoughts; it is a really good way of creating a good class environment where this allows peer support. But from my perspective her “comprehension constructor” method directs much more of the students thinking process, it “…help[s] students name their thinking and make it visible” (pg: 76) as the teacher develops these sheets with in mind “…how [he/she/] would read the piece and what [he/she] would need to do as a reader to get through it” (76).
I would have to say that the “double-entry diary” is one of my favorite forms for students to put down their thoughts on paper, especially because it easily can be used for any class’ subject. I like that students can extract the quotes that provoked them thoughts or questions and write them down onto a table, where then they would write down their “connection” or question in the adjacent box. From this step, students could get together and discuss their thoughts and findings, “all readers can benefit from the talk of others…they will have the support of the group and can try ideas with others” (pg: 84). On a final thought, I must say that reading this reminded me of these methods being taught to me during my grade school education; I was gaining lifelong skills without really knowing, which is very impressive, and proves that these methods do in fact work.  

3 comments:

  1. I agree that asking questions is a sign of some understanding. I remember being in classes where I didn't even grasp the basics of what was being discussed and I was not able to even formulate a question at times. All I could say was, "I don't get any of this." I would like to learn more about the double-entry diary. It seems like a useful tool that could come in very handy in my classes.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I also like the public chart idea. When students are stumped this chart can serve as a resource for ideas. I also like the idea of the diary. I think keeping diaries or journals are very effective for keeping notes and important information you want to go back to in the future. It's nice to have a place to keep all of your ideas and notes when writing.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yes, I love the "whole-group thinking" and public chart. Sometimes seeing that you are not alone in having a thought, will give you confidence to speak up.. or just plain confidence in your comprehension.. "aha! I AM getting this." It also gives students an idea of what the teacher is looking for, a kind of modeling the thought process, so they know what is expected. I do love the "Double-Entry Diary" strategy. I particularly like the NAME of it. I use this all the time in my own studies, but really like having a name to this strategy. And then the added step of sharing amongst peers. I have already copied and pasted 2 of your entries to save for future references. I think I might need this book! :)

    ReplyDelete